There is no basic agentive biological unit. But the cell is the unit of choice. So let’s look at the basic organismic atom—the cell.
Category: Biology and physicalism
- Man, the great protoplasm bag, originated as a recoiler
- DNA: agent or bridge?
- Agentive awareness derives from pain
- Organismic unity and rationalist metaphysics
- I forgot: I’m in the house on the river
- The explosion of a lifetime
- Can neurons break the rules?
- Your house is on fire
- Self-deconstruction by way of materialism
- Self as artifact of grammar
- A new Way of Unity
- The best example of how biology is the most determinate driver of value and meaning
- People are basically walking sponges
- The extent of magick
- Polyps, not particles
- Matter is sentience
- Darkness and the drive to understand
- Survival and survival-irrelevant interests
- Does knowing you’re a robot help?
- Snake patterns are taking over the Lego box
Who is really in charge—DNA or the cell? The “library” of chromosomes, or the vast coordinated ecosystem inside the cell? Well, if DNA is really just a set of instructions, then how can we call it the agent and end of all the various episodes of biological struggle?
Or is it ju...Read More
The pain of fear (or fear-pain) is the prime mover of all executive action. Fear-pain is a biological construct that motivates the organism to avoid physical pain or death.
Fear-pain emerged when the very first properly modular and coordinated negentropic system emerged, one that could propel the organism into rapid...Read More
It is common to say that the organism “is in some sense a unity.” This unity from the external third-person view is the total mass and intelligence of the organism. All internal motion counts. All of it plays a part in the culminating action potentials that determine the thing’s “voluntary” action.
I was defeated with tiredness, my mind was a cloud of unclarity, my will was nought—I could perceive but not exert. I was done for.
So I slouched forward, almost in Rabbit Pose, at the huge low glass table that has become my writing table since Cuntjin left.
I saw m...Read More
A lifetime, the gradual unfolding of bodily development, is actually a slow, lifelong explosion. After our reproductive prime, the body begins to fall apart. Then, when we die, this falling apart accelerates rapidly. With the advantage of time-elapse photography, we would see the body visibly exploding, its putrid froth seeping...Read More
What makes us think that brain cells are any less automatic than ligands signaling platelets to migrate towards a wound? Do you intend your ligands towards an unknown cut? And do you then intend them to secrete signal chemicals needed to attract a convention of platelets? Are you really the...Read More
Your house is on fire with the concern produced by meiosis. Meiosis is the spring of all our world-making concern, no matter how sublimated (or even inverted) this motivation may be.
The compulsive, perpetual making of half-selves is the very occult doing that drives the person and the personality. Meiosis...Read More
The so-called subject (The Voice that says “I think …”) is a chemical process. It’s not just that The Voice is chemicals. It’s worse than that. The Voice—aka you—is a chemical process.
That’s right—“you” don’t even exist as a substance-type thing. You are an epiphenomenon effected by a way of movement. The substrate...Read More
In your gross form, the so-called YOU is a collection of gelatinous blobs hanging onto rock-like sticks made of calcium phosphate.
What about the ghost-like self that seems to be running the blob-covered sticks? The self is an artifact of The Voice—the commentator who prepends “I think …” to its announc...Read More
… that the YOU right here sitting now is the same YOU that undertakes gastrulation.
But why stop there?
Rudolf Otto was the Joesph Campbell of mystical experience and succeeded in reducing all particular mystical (here defined as subject–object fusional or self–universe combining) experience to two purely formal types—the Inward Way and the ...Read More
Here is the best example of how biology drives meaning—in theory, art, and even its recent nemesis, religion. (Remember that back in the old times religion was not only metaphorical psychology but also cosmology and biology. Today, our cosmology and biology have improved. We know that the sky is not a...Read More
So I was about to Google what is probably the smartest thing I’ve ever said, which is that people are basically walking sponges.
Smart because true and startling. (If a sentence is true but surprisingly so, then it’s smart or stand-up worthy.) Sponges are the key moment in our evolution bec...Read More
Magick, the causing of change in conformity with will, is self-evidently operative in certain domains. For example:
- My will itself is an object under magickal control of my will. I can will myself to will one thing rather than another.
- The imagination is under magickal control of my wil...
That particles (particulate matter, spherical blobs, or wobbly spiky blobs, or quivering string loops) decay is … astonishing. That particles exist is astonishing. What supports their short-lived presence? To handle this notion in our 3-D imagination, we use the upward surge of a droplet of liquid from the surface of a...Read More
CSH: Content was making the Searle point that consciousness simpliciter is not a formal-abstract information processing network, something that can be replicated by a Turing machine. Consciousness is not the effect of value-mapping. It’s not address content changing with an algorithm. That thing isn’t the consciousness. What it is, is the...Read More
Yvonne: I feel like the core of why I try to understand things, at the center of it, there’s a disturbance. Not just disturbance in the general sense, but disturbance with the negative connotation attached, like a bad …
CSH: Yeah, suffering! Dukkha. This is the fundamental idea of Buddhism. You...Read More
Physics has made survival-interested cell giants. Our survival interest is something basic. We are cellular automata, and our current configuration is a logical consequence of the tautological fact that any pattern will exist only if it exists. We don’t know if existence is good or bad, but we do know t...Read More
CSH: We’re talking about perceiving the irrational basis of your desiring, about perceiving that your motivator is irrational, about seeing that the set of commands that drives you is not a proper basis for living—and not being able to do anything about it. Because it constitutes you so deeply that it’...Read More
Casey: We’re not OK that death is coming. What does that mean?
CSH: You’re clinging on to the kind of consciousness that a body has. Matter, generally, is conscious. But when you organize it into networks that allow it to toss things around in a spacetime rhythm and manage a b...Read More